Wikipedia reliable source

Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start..

In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis ...I agree with Zero, the source is reliable and due because it is a review of a book in question. It makes common sense to summarize the author's views in an article on that book. - GizzyCatBella 🍁 14:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Reply ; I agree with Biruitorul, the source is reliable.Jan 9, 2021 · Since 2018 Facebook has used Wikipedia to provide information buttons with the sources of news articles. ... embarrassments—and its own disclaimer that “Wikipedia is not a reliable source ...

Did you know?

Yet, because anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, it’s often highly stigmatized in academic communities. This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource. “The first step is admitting that everyone, from students to doctors, uses Wikipedia,” writes Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia ...Jasper Jackson. Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”. The ...But it's a trustworthy source. We have to stop underestimating Wikipedia's power as a reliable information source. Rachel Cunneen. by Rachel ...

According to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ... So, to summarize, it is true that Wikipedia is not a reliable source in academic circles. However, this does not have to mean that you can’t use it if you’re smart about it. Now that the reliability debate on Wikipedia is settled, once and for all, we can move on to the next part – how to effectively use Wikipedia for academic research …For sources pertaining primarily or specifically to Christian music of all genres, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources . For sources that deal with South Korean culture, including K-pop and other forms of Korean music, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources . For sources that focus on Latin music and its subgenres, see ...For more than 200 years, HMS has been the most prestigious and trusted source of medical education in the world. The Harvard Medical School name is synonymous with best-in-class learning, clinical excellence and innovative biomedical research—an assurance that the knowledge imparted creates transformational impact. Our Library.

Wikipedia is an excellent place to go for information, but many researchers don’t feel comfortable citing it as a resource due to its open contribution model - in other words, anyone can edit Wikipedia. They just don't feel that Wikipedia is a reliable source of information, whereas a source like Britannica is, generally, more reliable.The short answer is yes, you can . . . but you probably shouldn't. Instead, try to find the original source from where the Wikipedia contributor got their information by looking for in-article citations. If you can find a source, it's a good idea to cite that instead, especially if it's a primary source. If there's no citation, it's time to do ... ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Wikipedia reliable source. Possible cause: Not clear wikipedia reliable source.

Trail mix. Trail mix or gorp is a type of snack mix, typically a combination of granola, dried fruit, nuts, and sometimes candy, developed as a food to be taken along on hikes. Trail …The best way you can be a reliable source is to strictly adhere to the guidelines pertaining to them. This means to cite all information you add to articles, to be sure all information is verifiable, and not to include original research in your additions. If you get known for being a reliable source--that is, for using authoritative sources ...

Many students assume that the online, free encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a valid, authoritative and useful reference source for their scholarly work as a student ...

mikayla demaiter barstool 8 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brewing Network. 2 comments. 9 Standards for brewery articles. 4 comments. 10 Beer articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release. 1 comment. 11 WikiProject cleanup listing. 2 comments. 12 Invitation to participate! 1 comment. Toggle the table of contents.Health information services. Employees. 279 (2018) URL. www .healthline .com. Healthline Media, Inc. is an American website and provider of health information headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was founded in 1999, relaunched in 2006, and established as a standalone entity in January 2016. craigslist magee msbachelor of arts in music There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons: As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source , which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis. labor laws for traveling employees Everyone got up in arms about it not having R-60s in game because "Wikipedia cites a reliable source"; only for someone to dig up a copy of the book and show that it actually stated the Su-7BLK carried no air-to-air missiles (and that the Wikipedia article was citing a false claim to the book). Wikipedia is generally very good. can you eat pigweednyc weather wundergrounddeals dollar store near me Also, major universities will accept the site as a reliable source when citing information in a research paper, something Wikipedia can't claim. MSN Encarta MSN Encarta is another online encyclopedia that bypasses the problems that plague Wikipedia. All entries have been written and fact-checked by professionals and the site will never be ... lightwire theater a very electric christmas JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most reliable databases since the sources are selected very carefully before being placed there. Microsoft Academic.Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. ਫਰਮੇ ਦੇ ਮਾਪਦੰਡ [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. ਮਾਪਦੰਡ ਵੇਰਵਾ ਕਿਸਮ ਦਰਜਾ Reason reason Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip … yu gi oh master duel branded despialio kuok waiori of the dragon chain chapter 20 Print sources (and web-based versions of those sources) tend to be the most reliable. Examples include: books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, websites of any of the above, and other websites that meet the same requirements as a reputable print-based source.